Boys Soccer α-Ω Rankings (2010)

==== Report #8: Final ====

α. Troy (18-3-1; 647) -- [#6-Div 1]
2. Rochester Adams (13-3-5; 625) -- [#8-Div 1]
3. Bloomfield Hills Lahser (19-5-3; 613) -- [#2-Div 2]
4. Lake Orion (9-6-3; 578)
5. N. Farmington (15-4-1; 577)
6. Troy Athens (9-7-3; 565)
7. Clarkston (7-7-4; 563)
8. Rochester Hills Stoney Creek (9-9-7; 560)
9. Rochester (6-8-6; 559)
10. Berkley (15-4-0; 556)
11. Auburn Hills Avondale (13-7-1; 547) -- [HM-Div 2]
12. Birmingham Groves (14-5-3; 532)
13. Bloomfield Hills Andover (13-4-4; 526)
14. Farmington (12-5-3; 523)
15. W. Bloomfield (8-11-1; 493)
16. Royal Oak (2-13-3; 476)
17. Oxford (9-10-1; 446)
18. Pontiac (5-10-0; 436)
19. F. Hills Harrison (4-13-0; 435)
20. Birmingham Seaholm (5-11-3; 429)
21. Ferndale (4-14-2; 366)
Ω. Hazel Park (0-16-0; 307)

Upsets: 6.76% (20 of 296; 295 games); Rating Adjustment: +32.58709

==== Report #7 (--10-17) ====

(Final Regular Season Report)

α. Troy * (14-2-1; 634) -- [#4-Div 1]
2. Bloomfield Hills Lahser (13-4-3; 606) -- [#9-Div 2]
3. Rochester Adams (8-2-5; 600)
4. N. Farmington (13-3-1; 592)
5. Berkley (15-3-0; 589) -- [HM-Div 1]
6. Lake Orion (7-5-3; 564.4)
7. Clarkston (7-6-4; 563.7)
8. Birmingham Groves (14-4-3; 554)
9. Rochester (6-7-6; 553)
10. Troy Athens (8-6-3; 551)
11. Bloomfield Hills Andover (12-3-4; 548) -- [#10 Div 2]
12. Rochester Hills Stoney Creek (7-6-7; 547)
13. Auburn Hills Avondale (11-6-1; 546)
14. Farmington (11-4-3; 532)
15. W. Bloomfield (8-10-1; 506)
16. Royal Oak (2-12-2; 476)
17. Oxford (9-9-1; 463)
18. Birmingham Seaholm (5-10-3; 460)
19. Pontiac (5-9-0; 457)
20. F. Hills Harrison (3-12-0; 419)
21. Ferndale (4-13-2; 383)
Ω. Hazel Park (0-15-0; 320)

Upsets: 7.41% (16 of 216; 252 games); Rating Adjustment: +28.82905

==== Report #6 (--10-10) ====

α. Troy * (13-1-1; 658) -- [#3-Div 1]
2. Bloomfield Hills Lahser (13-3-3; 625) -- [#7-Div 2]
3. Rochester Adams (8-2-4; 606)
4. N. Farmington (12-3-1; 595)
5. Berkley (12-3-0; 574)
6. Lake Orion (6-5-2; 569)
7. Clarkston (6-6-4; 565)
8. Bloomfield Hills Andover (11-3-2; 552) -- [HM Div 2]
9. Troy Athens (7-6-2; 546)
10. Birmingham Groves (13-4-2; 545)
11. Auburn Hills Avondale (11-6-0; 543)
12. Rochester (5-7-5; 538)
13. Rochester Hills Stoney Creek (6-6-7; 529)
14. Farmington (10-4-3; 525)
15. W. Bloomfield (8-8-1; 503)
16. Royal Oak (2-11-2; 472)
17. Oxford (8-8-1; 503)
18. Birmingham Seaholm (5-9-3; 460)
19. Pontiac (4-9-0; 450)
20. F. Hills Harrison (3-11-0; 416)
21. Ferndale (4-11-2; 389)
Ω. Hazel Park (0-14-0; 318)

Upsets: 8.04% (16 of 199; 230 games); Rating Adjustment: +26.57175

==== Report #5 (--10-03) ====

α. Troy * (13-0-0; 695) -- [#2-Div 1]
2. Bloomfield Hills Lahser (10-3-2; 619) -- [#7-Div 2]
3. N. Farmington (11-2-0; 606)
4. Rochester Adams (6-2-3; 580)
5. Berkley (10-3-0; 565)
6. Lake Orion (4-5-2; 563)
7. Auburn Hills Avondale (11-4-0; 556) -- [HM Div 2]
8. Clarkston (5-5-3; 552)
9. Rochester (5-5-4; 551)
10. Bloomfield Hills Andover (11-3-1; 547) -- [HM Div 2]
11. Troy Athens (6-5-2; 546)
12. Birmingham Groves (11-4-2; 543)
13. Farmington (10-3-3; 538)
14. Rochester Hills Stoney Creek (6-6-5; 526)
15. W. Bloomfield (5-8-1; 493)
16. Oxford (7-7-1; 475)
17. Royal Oak (2-9-2; 469)
18. Birmingham Seaholm (4-7-3; 456)
19. Pontiac (3-8-0; 441)
20. Ferndale (4-9-2; 397)
21. F. Hills Harrison (2-8-0; 392)
Ω. Hazel Park (0-11-0; 310)

Upsets: 8.62% (15 of 174; 199 games); Rating Adjustment: +24.15865

==== Report #4 (--09-26) ====

α. Troy * (13-0-0; 685) -- [#3-Div 1]
2. Bloomfield Hills Lahser (9-3-2; 617) -- [#8-Div 2]
3. N. Farmington (8-2-0; 595)
4. Lake Orion (4-4-1; 585)
5. Rochester Adams (5-2-3; 576) -- [HM Div 1]
6. Berkley (9-2-0; 570)
7. Farmington (9-1-3; 554)
8. Rochester Hills Stoney Creek (5-5-4; 545.9)
9. Rochester (5-3-4; 545.8)
10. Troy Athens (5-4-2; 541)
11. Clarkston (3-5-3; 537.0)
12. Auburn Hills Avondale (9-4-0; 536.8) -- [HM Div 2]
13. Birmingham Groves (10-4-2; 532)
14. Bloomfield Hills Andover (9-3-1; 522) -- [HM Div 2]
15. W. Bloomfield (5-7-1; 491)
16. Oxford (7-4-1; 477)
17. Birmingham Seaholm (2-7-3; 444.3)
18. Royal Oak (1-8-2; 443.7)
19. Pontiac (1-7-0; 434)
20. Ferndale (4-8-1; 399)
21. F. Hills Harrison (2-7-0; 394)
Ω. Hazel Park (0-9-0; 312)

Upsets: 5.33% (8 of 150; 172 games); Rating Adjustment: +22.65101

==== Report #3 (--09-19) ====

α. Troy * (9-0-0; 703) -- [#3-Div 1]
2. Bloomfield Hills Lahser (8-2-2; 612) -- [#4-Div 2]
3. Lake Orion (3-3-1; 611)
4. Rochester Adams (4-2-3; 588) -- [#8 Div 1]
5. Troy Athens (4-2-2; 581)
6. N. Farmington (5-2-0; 567)
7. Bloomfield Hills Andover (8-1-1; 564) -- [#6 Div 2]
8. Rochester Hills Stoney Creek (5-5-2; 552)
9. Auburn Hills Avondale (7-3-0; 551) -- [HM Div 2]
10. Clarkston (3-5-2; 536)
11. Berkley (6-2-0; 531)
12. Rochester (3-3-4; 530)
13. Farmington (7-1-3; 521)
14. W. Bloomfield (4-6-1; 488)
15. Birmingham Groves (8-3-2; 474)
16. Oxford (6-4-0; 458)
17. Royal Oak (1-6-2; 446)
18. Pontiac (1-5-0; 443)
19. Birmingham Seaholm (2-6-2; 434)
20. Ferndale (2-5-0; 376)
21. F. Hills Harrison (2-5-0; 375)
Ω. Hazel Park (0-8-0; 288)

Upsets: 5.33% (8 of 150; 172 games); Rating Adjustment: +22.65101

==== Report #2 (--09-12) ====

α. Troy (7-0-0; 711) -- [#4 Div 1]
2. N. Farmington (5-1-0; 659)
3. Bloomfield Hills Lahser (7-2-1; 630) -- [#6-Div 2]
4. Rochester Hills Stoney Creek (5-3-2; 587)
5. Lake Orion (2-2-1; 577)
6. Berkley (5-2-0; 576)
7. Rochester Adams (4-2-1; 569)
8. Bloomfield Hills Andover (6-1-1; 568) -- [#7 Div 2]
9. Troy Athens (2-2-2; 565)
10. Farmington (6-1-2; 564)
11. Auburn Hills Avondale (5-2-0; 562) -- [#10 Div 2]
12. W. Bloomfield (2-6-0; 496)
13. Clarkston (3-3-2; 495)
14. Oxford (6-3-0; 485)
15. Birmingham Groves (7-3-1; 483)
16. Birmingham Seaholm (2-4-0; 479)
17. Pontiac (0-4-0; 448)
18. Rochester (1-5-2; 432)
19. Royal Oak (1-5-2; 432)
20. Ferndale (2-3-0; 387)
21. F. Hills Harrison (2-4-0; 32)
Ω. Hazel Park (0-6-0; 277)

Upsets: 3.74% (4 of 107; 120 games); Rating Adjustment: +20.40107

==== Report #1 (--09-05) ====

α. Troy (4-0-0; 760)
2. Auburn Hills Avondale (3-1-0; 660) -- [#10-Div 2]
3. Bloomfield Hills Lahser (5-2-1; 648) -- [#6-Div 2]
4. Berkley (4-1-0; 647)
5. N. Farmington (3-1-0; 632)
6. Farmington (5-0-2; 619)
7. Rochester Hills Stoney Creek (5-1-2; 607)
8. W. Bloomfield (2-5-0; 565)
9. Bloomfield Hills Andover (5-1-1; 556) -- [#8 Div 2]
10. Oxford (6-1-0; 551)
11. Birmingham Seaholm (2-3-0; 549)
12. Troy Athens (1-1-2; 539)
13. Birmingham Groves (4-3-0; 534)
14. Pontiac (0-2-0; 520)
15. Ferndale (0-3-0; 451)
16. Rochester Adams (2-1-1; 448) -- [HM Div 1]
17. Royal Oak (1-3-1; 414)
18. Lake Orion (1-2-0; 378) -- [HM Div 1]
19. F. Hills Harrison (2-3-0; 343)
20. Clarkston (2-2-1; 307)
21. Rochester (1-2-2; 257)
Ω. Hazel Park (0-4-0; 257)

Upsets: 3.80% (3 of 79; 88 games); Rating Adjustment: +24.08231